<em> Tube-Mac Indus., Inc. v. Campbell </em>
The Federal Circuit Court affirmed an Eastern District Court of Virginia’s decision to mandate a correction of inventorship of U.S. Patent 9,376,049 (the “’049 patent”) which added Gary Mackay and Dan Hewson as named inventors.
Steamboat Willie Enters Public Domain
On January 1, 2024, Steamboat Willie from Walt Disney Animation Studios entered the public domain. Disney successfully extended copyright through lobbying, but recent laws led to its expiration. Horror adaptations of Steamboat Willie are planned. Despite concerns, Disney's brand and trademark protections likely shield it from significant harm.
Ex’s and Oh No’s: Bad Bunny’s Ex Sues for Copyright Infringement
Puerto Rican rapper Bad Bunny was sued for copyright infringement by his ex-girlfriend who claims that her voice is used without her consent in two songs: “Pa Ti” and “Dos Mil 16.”
<em> Naterra Int’l, Inc. v. Bensalem </em>
The Federal Circuit vacated the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s denial of Naterra’s cancellation petition because the Board erred in their decisions regarding the first and third DuPont factors.
The Rx for Counterfeit Drugs: Protecting Pharma’s Patents and Trademarks
Gilead Sciences Inc. and Janssen Pharmaceuticals have accused Safe Chain Solutions of distributing counterfeit HIV medications. Safe Chain's unauthorized use of trademarks not only poses major public health risks, it also undermines pharmaceutical brands' integrity, emphasizing the need to protect intellectual property and trademarks in the healthcare industry.
A Collision of Precedents: Assessing the <em> LKQ Corp. v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC </em> Patent Case
For the first time since 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sat en banc to review a patent case. LKQ Corp v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC marks a pivotal battle over design patents and spotlights the debate surrounding existing Court precedents.
No Redemption for This Whiskey Bottle
Diageo, brand owner of Bulleit bourbon, recently defended its victory against W.J. Deutsch & Sons, owner of Redemption whiskey. The lawsuit claimed that the round shouldered “canteen-style” bottle utilized by Redemption was similar to the designed used by Diageo.
Get a Kick Out of This
Nike filed two patent infringement lawsuits on November 6, one against New Balance in the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts and another against Skechers in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, concerning its Flyknit shoewear technology. Nike sued multiple other global brands such as Puma, Adidas, and Lululemon regarding this same technology in the past five years.
Industry-Specific Patent Policy
Patent scholars have long called for industry-specific patent policy; however, these policies must support cross-functional collaboration amongst different technologies to continue to foster innovation.
<em>Actelion Pharms. LTD v. Mylan Pharms. Inc.</em>
The Federal Circuit Court issued a precedential decision vacating the District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia’s claim construction order and remanded the case to consider extrinsic evidence and its impact on claim construction.
<em>Spireon, Inc. v. Flex Ltd.</em>
The Federal Circuit ruled that the TTAB failed to properly weigh the conceptual and commercial strength of a mark by not considering third-party registrations and by placing the burden to establish non-use on the applicant.
Beyond Earth: Intellectual Property Rights and Space Exploration
When intellectual property in space is involved, challenges in determining jurisdictional and legal frameworks for space activities, contrasting perspectives on extending Earth's IP laws to space, and contemplating the development of a new set of laws specific to space are prevalent. Clear and comprehensive IP laws are necessary to protect innovators and promote exploration and collaboration in the evolving space industry.
Bolstering Brand Association: Preventing Loss of Trademarks to Genericization
One major concern with successful trademark use, especially in the social media age, is that trademark protections will diminish due to genericization, which is common usage of a mark by the public that is unassociated with the brand. By taking protective measures, including early trademark enforcement and carefully-worded advertising, companies can mitigate and manage risk associated with trademark genericization.
It’s Barbie’s World. Burberry’s Just Living in It.
Burberry and Mattel, maker of Barbie, recently settled a U.S. trademark dispute arising from Burberry’s application for registration of the mark “BRBY”, as Mattel withdraws its Opposition Notice and Burberry’s abandons its registration application.
AI vs. Artists: The Bout of the Decade
AI's rapid growth is raising legal concerns, as AI models allegedly use copyrighted materials to train. Lawsuits are questioning AI's legality, as well as its impact on artists and copyrighted content. As the cases are determined, so too will the technology's future and its impact on creators' rights.
<em>Cosmic Crusaders LLC v. Andrusiek</em>
The Federal Circuit Court ruled in favor of affirming the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in their decision that Andrusiek had sufficient prior use of the same mark that Cosmic Crusaders had registered, thus cancelling Cosmic Crusaders’ registration
Is the British Museum Losing Its Marbles? Copyrighting Antiquities and the Museum's Future In the Face of 3D Scanning Technology
The British Museum faces legal challenges over the Elgin Marbles, with the Institute for Digital Archaeology’s 3D scanning efforts sparking debates on copyrights, cultural heritage, and the future of historical artifact preservation.
<em>Baxalta Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.</em>
The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling that Baxalta’s patent for antibodies that treat Hemophilia A was invalid for lack of enablement and applied the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi to reach its determination.
<em>Bad Elf, LLC v. Flex Ltd.</em>
The Federal Circuit determined that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) erred in its likelihood of confusion analysis and remanded a case to reconsider its application of the conceptual and commercial strength DuPont Factor in light of Spireon.
Dunkin’ v. Vapin
Dunkin filed a suit against an e-cigarette company’ for infringing Dunkin’s trademark. Dunkin’ asserts that the e-cigarette company “Vapin” essentially took Dunkin’s style and color from their trademark and replaced the word “Dunkin’” to “Vapin.” This case has the potential to help show a clear case of what the likelihood of confusion analysis of trademark infringement looks like.