With Weight Loss Drugs in High Demand, Trademark Litigation Targets Counterfeits
Novo Nordisk and Lilly, two pharmaceutical giants behind the blockbuster diabetes and obesity drugs Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, and Zepbound (Ozempic, et al.), currently find themselves embroiled in legal battles with wellness centers, medical spas, and compounding pharmacies. Both companies are taking action to protect their trademarks and intellectual property. Despite being separate companies, the key trademark-related legal concerns they face have significant overlap.
Cybersquatting and Large Corporations
There has been recent legal action on behalf of Adidas, as a company not in possession of the Adidas trademark created a domain using the Adidas name and was selling counterfeit Adidas goods. Creating and using a domain name with false intent with a trademark that is owned by another is known as cybersquatting, which is what was being done with the Adidas trademark in this case. Cybersquatting claims have also been made by the company behind the online retailer Temu.
<em> Tube-Mac Indus., Inc. v. Campbell </em>
The Federal Circuit Court affirmed an Eastern District Court of Virginia’s decision to mandate a correction of inventorship of U.S. Patent 9,376,049 (the “’049 patent”) which added Gary Mackay and Dan Hewson as named inventors.
Steamboat Willie Enters Public Domain
On January 1, 2024, Steamboat Willie from Walt Disney Animation Studios entered the public domain. Disney successfully extended copyright through lobbying, but recent laws led to its expiration. Horror adaptations of Steamboat Willie are planned. Despite concerns, Disney's brand and trademark protections likely shield it from significant harm.
Biopic Legal Woes: Sony Suit Over Unpaid Fees
Two years after the Whitney Houston Biopic was released in theaters in the winter of 2022, Sony filed suit against Anthem Films LLC for unpaid fees concerning the late singer’s recordings held by Sony that were used in the Biopic.
<em> Freshub, Inc. v. Amazon, Inc. </em>
The Federal Circuit rejected Amazon’s cross-appeal and affirmed the district court ruling, determining that the lower court did not abuse its discretion or make a clear error on Amazon’s inequitable conduct defense.
Ex’s and Oh No’s: Bad Bunny’s Ex Sues for Copyright Infringement
Puerto Rican rapper Bad Bunny was sued for copyright infringement by his ex-girlfriend who claims that her voice is used without her consent in two songs: “Pa Ti” and “Dos Mil 16.”
<em> Naterra Int’l, Inc. v. Bensalem </em>
The Federal Circuit vacated the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s denial of Naterra’s cancellation petition because the Board erred in their decisions regarding the first and third DuPont factors.
<em> AlexSam, Inc., v. MasterCard Int’l Inc. </em>
AlexSam filed a breach of contract claim against MasterCard. The District Court held that the claim was prohibited under the parties’ covenant not to sue. The Federal Circuit reversed and remanded based on non-ambiguity in license agreements.
The Rx for Counterfeit Drugs: Protecting Pharma’s Patents and Trademarks
Gilead Sciences Inc. and Janssen Pharmaceuticals have accused Safe Chain Solutions of distributing counterfeit HIV medications. Safe Chain's unauthorized use of trademarks not only poses major public health risks, it also undermines pharmaceutical brands' integrity, emphasizing the need to protect intellectual property and trademarks in the healthcare industry.
A Collision of Precedents: Assessing the <em> LKQ Corp. v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC </em> Patent Case
For the first time since 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sat en banc to review a patent case. LKQ Corp v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC marks a pivotal battle over design patents and spotlights the debate surrounding existing Court precedents.
No Redemption for This Whiskey Bottle
Diageo, brand owner of Bulleit bourbon, recently defended its victory against W.J. Deutsch & Sons, owner of Redemption whiskey. The lawsuit claimed that the round shouldered “canteen-style” bottle utilized by Redemption was similar to the designed used by Diageo.
<em>Great Concepts, LLC v. Chutter, Inc.</em>
In Great Concepts, LLC v. Chutter, Inc., Chutter challenged the validity of Great Concept’s mark, claiming “DANTANNA’S” confuses their mark “DAN TANA,” challenging incontestability, and arguing that “DANTANN’S” was obtained by a false affidavit, so Great Concept’s mark is therefore fraudulent.
Game Development and Copyright Infringement: Valve, South Korea, and <em> Dark and Darker </em>
This case study illustrates how intellectual property affects the fastest-growing entertainment medium in the world through an analysis of the legal drama surrounding Dark and Darker, a hit indie game that was delisted from digital storefronts following allegations of copyright infringement.
No Right to Copyright for AI
The owner of an artificial intelligence filed a suit against the United States Copyright Office for denying his application for a piece of visual art created by the AI. This case has recently been appealed and will be a landmark decision regarding the rights of AI and their owners to the work that is created by AI.
The Copyright Royalty Board Affirmed Royalty Rates from 2022 and Set Rates Through 2027
In the summer of 2023, after streaming services appealed the 2018 decision by the Copyright Royalty Board that decided phonorecord licensing rates, the Board affirmed its original decision that granted artists 15.1% of the streaming services’ overall revenue through 2022. The Board also set rates to increase to 15.35% through 2027.
Fortnite Dance Under Fire Over Copyright Lawsuits
Renowned choreographer Kyle Hanagami has appealed a copyright violation claim against Fortnite (Epic Games), alleging its emotes copy his YouTube choreography.
Statute of Litigations: The Supreme Court Remixes Copyright Rules
The Supreme Court has granted a petition to review the 11th Circuit’s decision in Nealy v. Warner Chappell Music, Inc. to resolve a circuit split regarding the Copyright Act’s statute of limitations and the circuit courts’ discovery rules regarding copyright infringement.
Get a Kick Out of This
Nike filed two patent infringement lawsuits on November 6, one against New Balance in the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts and another against Skechers in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, concerning its Flyknit shoewear technology. Nike sued multiple other global brands such as Puma, Adidas, and Lululemon regarding this same technology in the past five years.